123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245 |
- // Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
- // Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
- // https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
- //
- // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
- // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
- // met:
- //
- // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
- // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
- // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
- // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
- // distribution.
- // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
- // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
- // this software without specific prior written permission.
- //
- // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
- // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
- // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
- // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
- // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
- // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
- // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
- // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
- // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
- // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
- // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
- syntax = "proto3";
- package google.protobuf;
- option java_package = "com.google.protobuf";
- option java_outer_classname = "FieldMaskProto";
- option java_multiple_files = true;
- option objc_class_prefix = "GPB";
- option csharp_namespace = "Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes";
- option go_package = "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/fieldmaskpb";
- option cc_enable_arenas = true;
- // `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
- //
- // paths: "f.a"
- // paths: "f.b.d"
- //
- // Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
- // fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
- // message in `f.b`.
- //
- // Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
- // returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
- // Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
- //
- // # Field Masks in Projections
- //
- // When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
- // sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
- // specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
- // example is applied to a response message as follows:
- //
- // f {
- // a : 22
- // b {
- // d : 1
- // x : 2
- // }
- // y : 13
- // }
- // z: 8
- //
- // The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
- // (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
- // output):
- //
- //
- // f {
- // a : 22
- // b {
- // d : 1
- // }
- // }
- //
- // A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
- // paths string.
- //
- // If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
- // operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
- // had been specified).
- //
- // Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
- // top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
- // field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
- // list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
- // in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
- // other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
- // clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
- // any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
- // behavior for APIs.
- //
- // # Field Masks in Update Operations
- //
- // A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
- // targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
- // to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
- // and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
- // describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
- // fields not covered by the mask.
- //
- // If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
- // be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
- // a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
- //
- // If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
- // update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
- // in the target resource.
- //
- // For example, given the target message:
- //
- // f {
- // b {
- // d: 1
- // x: 2
- // }
- // c: [1]
- // }
- //
- // And an update message:
- //
- // f {
- // b {
- // d: 10
- // }
- // c: [2]
- // }
- //
- // then if the field mask is:
- //
- // paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
- //
- // then the result will be:
- //
- // f {
- // b {
- // d: 10
- // x: 2
- // }
- // c: [1, 2]
- // }
- //
- // An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
- // repeated and message fields.
- //
- // In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
- // be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
- // Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
- // instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
- // not provide a mask as described below.
- //
- // If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
- // all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
- // Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
- // fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
- // the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
- // behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
- // a field mask, producing an error if not.
- //
- // As with get operations, the location of the resource which
- // describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
- // operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
- // required to be honored by the API.
- //
- // ## Considerations for HTTP REST
- //
- // The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
- // be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
- // (PUT must only be used for full updates).
- //
- // # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
- //
- // In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
- // separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
- // to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
- //
- // As an example, consider the following message declarations:
- //
- // message Profile {
- // User user = 1;
- // Photo photo = 2;
- // }
- // message User {
- // string display_name = 1;
- // string address = 2;
- // }
- //
- // In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
- //
- // mask {
- // paths: "user.display_name"
- // paths: "photo"
- // }
- //
- // In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
- //
- // {
- // mask: "user.displayName,photo"
- // }
- //
- // # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
- //
- // Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
- // following message:
- //
- // message SampleMessage {
- // oneof test_oneof {
- // string name = 4;
- // SubMessage sub_message = 9;
- // }
- // }
- //
- // The field mask can be:
- //
- // mask {
- // paths: "name"
- // }
- //
- // Or:
- //
- // mask {
- // paths: "sub_message"
- // }
- //
- // Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
- // paths.
- //
- // ## Field Mask Verification
- //
- // The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
- // request should verify the included field paths, and return an
- // `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
- message FieldMask {
- // The set of field mask paths.
- repeated string paths = 1;
- }
|